Crypto: Comparison of Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin

Bitcoin and Bitcoin cash are two separate cryptocurrencies with their functioning and technological peculiarities. However, you may not understand that by their BTC and BCH names or even token symbols. Bitcoin was established in 2009 as the oldest cryptocurrency and the most significant market capitalization. Bitcoin Cash was bifurcated by Bitcoin in 2017 and became an asset itself. But how did it happen?

When Satoshi Nakamoto, the unknown person behind Bitcoin, wrote his white paper, he aimed to have a peer-to-peer electronic currency version that allows online payments to be sent to another person without going to a financial institution. Twelve years later, this idea has already become a ghost of a digital coin defining the crypto-monetary market.

In addition to the typical worries about the unpredictability and volatility of any cryptocurrency, the velocity of processing such transactions has been a question. Bitcoin transactions are first processed and then verified, subsequently stored in a digital ledger called a blockchain. For more precise and accurate information,  Like this application, you can learn more about bitcoin.

Overview of Bitcoin

Bitcoin was established in 2009 as a backdrop to the economic crisis by Satoshi Nakamoto, an unknown internet user or group operating under a pseudonym. It was touted as peer-to-peer money which did not depend on central banks. Whereas governments spontaneously manipulate fiat currency, only a limited amount of bitcoins – 21 million – will ever be accessible.

Until the limit is achieved, a mining process will constantly add new coins to the market in which powerful computers execute computations that authenticate the legitimacy of transactions. To pay for their equipment, miners receive fees for confirmed transactions and freshly generated bitcoins. Although Bitcoin was intended to be used as digital payment, the new cryptocurrency’s volatility attracted speculators while preventing its use as a legal tender.

Bitcoin: The Problem of Scalability

There have been concerns about Bitcoin’s limits since the first block was generated. The very first public comment to the original proposal indicated concern regarding its scalability: “I don’t appear to scale your concept to the needed size in the manner I understand.” The reason is that the network is restricted to how many blocks of transaction records may be processed during a particular period due to Bitcoin’s size restriction.

Around every 10 minutes, new blocks are generated and restricted to 1 megabyte in size. Consequently, the Bitcoin network has never been able to handle more than eight transactions per second – a poor statistic besides the 1,700 TPS managed by a traditional payment network like Visa. To tackle this problem, engineers have launched Segregated Witness – a 2015 update still being implemented across the web.

Overview of Bitcoin Cash

When a modification to the Bitcoin protocol is suggested, users and developers known as governance approve the protocol. In 2017, these participants discussed how they might tackle the scalability challenge.

Finally, it came down to whether they should increase each block’s actual size limit or transfer some of or even whole transactions to another layer, leaving only more significant transactions on the base layer. Those who supported SegWit fell into the last group, arguing that the original 1MB limit was best maintained.

On the other side, a sufficiently significant number of users advocated raising block size to establish a “hard gap” in the Bitcoin code that resulted in Bitcoin Cash as a new currency. This approach has also caused the original Bitcoin project to generate additional, often termed split coins, cryptocurrencies without beginning from scratch.

Quick Transactions

Bitcoin Cash was given its own set of regulations, including an increase from 1MB to 32MB of maximum block size. This shift dramatically increases the processing rate of transactions, allowing BCH to execute up to 200 transactions per second.

In addition, the bigger block size made room on blocks far less competitive, which drastically reduced prices. Bitcoin costs are on average $4.40 per transaction but, according to BitInfoCharts, have reached more than $60. On the other hand, the BCH costs were never more than $1 and averaged 1.3 cents.

How different is Bitcoin Cash from Bitcoin?

The first question for many of us is the worth of each one as an investment. When it was written, the Bitcoin price is over Rs. 35 lakh in India, while the Bitcoin Cash price was above Rs. 50,000 in India. The cost of the tokens as an investor is not as essential as to whether or not they value, so that’s not the only thing you need to know.

The first key distinction is that Bitcoin Cash has a reduced transaction cost compared to Bitcoin and transmits data rapidly. So Bitcoin Cash may be utilized simultaneously by more individuals. It is crucial to highlight that Bitcoin Cash does not have as much consumer confidence as Bitcoin, at least for now.

This makes it scalable and capable of doing more transactions per second, decreasing the environmental effect and theoretically boosting its usefulness as a currency. On its website, Bitcoin Cash says that it can handle up to 200 transactions per second, lowering transaction costs.

What’s Better?

Whether Bitcoin is ever accepted as a payment method continues and does not appear to be an end in sight. In the meantime, the adoption of the original cryptocurrency continues to climb as investors try to benefit from its growing popularity.

In addition, Bitcoin remains feasible, despite the slower transaction speeds in instances where speed is less essential, for example, in real estate and car sales. Moreover, significant firms are introducing technologies that enable Bitcoin to be purchased every day.

On the other hand, Bitcoin Cash is largely obscure outside of cryptocurrency circles, but it remains the best option for near-immediate transfers, especially for smaller sums. Since the adoption level is still low, whether this is more attributable to platform modifications or the relative quantity of block space remains.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here